🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a flawed view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas represent an grave threat to European civilization. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge confronting the EU is not societal but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Today, roughly half of the global top fifty technology firms are US-based, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Problem

The growing disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The scene of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at more than $10bn, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This disparity raises a vital question: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of key reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented rules hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a service under a single regulatory framework to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national regimes, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these challenges, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to advance serious reform. Key reports on European competitiveness and the single market point to the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, these assets could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent retains considerable advantages: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if Europe does not become the leader in developing next-generation tech, it can still dramatically increase economic output by implementing and tailoring innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a decisive moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.