I'm a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, Yet Medicare for All Is the Top Solution for US Healthcare

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.

David West
David West

A digital artist and design consultant with over a decade of experience in visual storytelling and creative innovation.